World of Warcraft is awesome but...

May 30, 2010


So it has been a couple weeks now since I loaded up World of Warcraft for the second time after a long break. And in my previous post I talked about how the game had changed since I last played it and how awesome it is to be playing it again. But (and you knew it was coming), like everything else created by man, it does have its flaws.

The PvP aspect of World of Warcraft seems to be the one thing that is really keeping me interested. I look at it much like any other online game I play, I like to interact and do things with REAL people, not just with AI and while the PvE content in WoW is ridiculously cool, it's just not something I can continously do without a break. So the PvP fun is a very good way for me to keep the game flowing and interesting (and I happen to be reasonably good at it, which always helps).

But today I'm here to talk about the 'not so glossy' aspects of WoW that have become apparent to me over the last couple weeks. I'm level 53 now (a whole 20 odd levels higher than the last character I played) so it's safe to say that for now, WoW is a keeper. But seriously, WTF is up with the party system?

For all you shooter fans out there, you'd probably refer to it as 'matchmaking' but the basic understanding is that you put yourself into a queue for both dungeons (PvE) content and PvP. What you end up with at the end is anyone's guess. And herein lies the inescapable problem. WoW's popularity.

If you've played a decent amount of MMORPGs you'll know that there are many out there that are just utter crap. So when someone gets it right (as the team at Blizzard seem to have done), the gamers become spoiled little brats. Why bother staying in groups when you can get your loot and leave? Why bother keeping a group together when there is no penalty for leaving it and why bother caring when there are thousands of people waiting in the queue to party up? The 'rate a player' system for Xbox Live gamers comes to mind here. If you have a particularly poor gaming experience with someone, you can record and rate the player which then shows up in their profile as a percentage of 'Avoided' or 'Preferred' players. Sure, there will always be grounds for abuse for this sort of thing but hey, it's better than having no deterrent for bad behavior at all.

It becomes increasingly frustrating when you're trying to find a decent group only to have people leave in the middle of a dungeon or worse, right after they've looted the gear they need. The same thing happens in PvP as well where gamers will just leave a team if they don't score first. Alot of the matches I've played would have gone a whole lot better if the team I was on didn't toss in the towel like little wussies. And then there's the griefing which unfortunately, is a part of any game but is consistently annoying in WoW. Yes, it's unavoidable but still, if the people QQing away in a global chat channel spent half as much time concentrating on their game, they'd play a whole lot better.

Moral of the story is: WoW is great but... no game is perfect. Now, to level my Warlock to 60 :P

Image via Wikia

Buzz It



       


GameCulture Shout Box

Posted 07/03/10 at 12:44pm
ZippyDSMlee: lets see dragon age,bioshock fallout 3....mmmmmmm I need another 7 games :P
Posted 06/30/10 at 10:14pm
JulieGray: @SimonBob - Lol yup, very easy to think of the top 10 games that sucked :P
Posted 06/30/10 at 11:15am
SimonBob: I doubt I could do a "top 10 top 10 lists list" but I could certainly conjure up a bottom 10 of the worst.
Posted 06/24/10 at 08:18am
ZippyDSMlee: oh wait report it in the forums right? LOL
Posted 06/24/10 at 07:44am
ZippyDSMlee: spam in ze used game article.
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:15pm
ZippyDSMlee: be nice but I guess thats for the next huge site overhaul.
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:14pm
ZippyDSMlee: <p>Kay, so back to no links but my page url is not blocked...but I can do links on GPs site 0-o consistency in the sites would</p>
Posted 06/23/10 at 10:01pm
JulieGray: I deleted that old profile. @Simonbob and Zippy - try commenting now please. Thanks
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:38pm
ZippyDSM: Is its to much work to whitelist I understand but just saying it should not be hard to white list peeps.
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:36pm
ZippyDSM: Bug the forums for this issue as well?
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:35pm
ZippyDSM: Yes I know I got 2 frikkin logins I forgot...who do I bug to get this one deleted?
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:34pm
ZippyDSM: just saying you need to tweak the spam filter by letting staff/editors/writers,ect whitelist people that are flaged as spam
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:30pm
JulieGray: <p>Alot of spam these days uses links to obscure and sometimes virus infested websites so that's why the filter blocks links. If you want to discuss please refer to the forum, thanks!</p> <br />
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:29pm
JulieGray: @ Zippy - yes I know that Zippy, I was explaining what the spam module does dude not pointing fingers... :/
Posted 06/23/10 at 09:27pm
ZippyDSMlee: Just havign a link in your sig dose not eman you are spam, trying to force advert something off topic is spam.
Posted 06/23/10 at 05:28pm
JulieGray: Ok so I looked at the spam module filters and if you add links or have links in your sig you 're spam lol
Posted 06/23/10 at 04:44pm
JulieGray: So yeah it def wasn't intentional to stop you guys from posting links or w/eva :P
Posted 06/23/10 at 04:41pm
JulieGray: Please read this thread on the spam thing http://forums.theeca.com/showthread.php?p=126678#post126678
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:58am
ZippyDSMlee: Why not que the post for modertion then add users by name so their posts are let threw without having to ok it manaully?
Posted 06/23/10 at 11:57am
ZippyDSMlee: Ya the spam filter just taged me as well 0-o
Login or register to post shouts